DefenseOne's 'Why Haven't Terrorists Hit the US with a Devastating Cyber Attack?'

Sounds like a triple-reverse-Stockholm-syndrome-interrogatory, plus a rare reference by Michael Hayden: Note his '“These folks are not cyberdumb.” comment. All via Kathy Gilsinan, an Associate Editor at The Atlantic asking 'Why Haven't Terrorists Hit the US with a Devastating Cyber Attack?' Must have been a slow-cyber-news-day...

'“I’m as puzzled as you are,” said Michael Hayden, who served as CIA director from 2004 to 2008. “These folks are not cyberdumb.” “They use the web and show a great deal of sophistication in how they use it, for many purposes,” he added. “But they have not yet used it to create either digital or physical destruction. Others have.” - via Kathy Gilsinan, an Associate Editor at The Atlantic and writing at DefenseOne.

Well Done, Pete, Well Done

Behold: A well crafted white paper, targeting security related white papers, that is apparently a blog post, and most importantly, dripping with the sweet, sweet wine of security sarcasm. Today's Must Read!

'He Is (As A Matter Of Course) Correct'

Michael Rogers ADM USN, Director of the National Security Agency and Commander of the United States Cyber Command sums up 'cyber' quite nicely, indeed:

"Cyber is an operational domain in which we do a variety of missions and functions, many of which are very traditional,” Adm. Rogers said. “We do reconnaissance, we do fires, we do maneuvers. The same things I was used to as a surface [warfare] officer … I’m constantly going back to that.”

"Don’t make this thing so specialized, so unique, so different that it just gets pushed to the side. That will sub-optimize our ability to execute cyber operations, and quite frankly it will minimize or at least negatively impact, in my view, the operational outcomes, which is the whole reason we’re doing this in the first place.”